Skip to main content

Bard's 2010 Malt Analysis: The Earliest Sheet in the Archive

The earliest malt-analysis record recovered from the Bard's archive: a May 2010 worksheet holding two columns of numbers on Bard's malted sorghum — the brewery's own in-house tests beside a set of R&D results — nine years before the 2019 laboratory panels. Published verbatim, ambiguities marked, nothing reconstructed.

This is a working production document, not a laboratory certificate — one spreadsheet with an in-house test block and a block headed "RND RESULTS" dated May 21, 2010 for "BARD'S MALTED SORGHUM." Working documents skip the labels a certificate carries, so this page follows a strict rule: every value is published exactly as recorded, units are marked "unlabeled" where the sheet gave none, and anything interpretive is stated as interpretation, clearly separated from the data.

The dataset

In-house test block:

Measure (as labeled)Value
Bushel weight51
Moisture6.4
Protien (sic)10.8
Soluble Protien-day1 (sic)1.7
Soluble Protien-day2 (sic)2.2
S/T0.20
Alpha Amylase18 · 9.5 (two adjacent columns)
DP13.3 · 0 (two adjacent columns)
Assortment 7/64 · 6/64 · 5/64 · thru15.2 · 51.4 · 23.6 · 9.8
Grind analysis 14 · 30 · 60 · pan44.4 · 35.6 · 8 · 12

"RND RESULTS" block (dated 5/21/2010):

Measure (as labeled)Value
MOIST6
FRIABILTY (sic)41.4
FG as is81%
ALPHA9.5
DP0
COLOR2.44
TOTAL PROTEIN7.59
SOL PROTEIN1.32
S/T17.4
DON0.1
CLARITYSL HAZY
FILTRATIONNORMAL
AROMA/FLAVORSOMEWHAT FLOURY, STARCHY, LIGHT, THIN

Interpretation notes — stated as interpretation, not data

  • The duplicated enzyme columns: the in-house block's second alpha/DP values (9.5 and 0) match the RND block exactly. The most natural reading is that the RND numbers were copied beside the in-house ones for comparison — but the sheet doesn't say so, so that reading is ours, not the record's.
  • The two S/T entries: 0.20 in-house against 17.4 in the RND block. The in-house day-2 soluble protein over total protein (2.2 / 10.8) is 0.204 — consistent with the in-house S/T being recorded as a ratio where the RND block used percent. Again: consistent with, not proven by, the sheet.
  • DON 0.1 carries no unit. Deoxynivalenol is conventionally reported in ppm (mg/kg), and 0.1 ppm would sit far below every regulatory advisory level — but the sheet does not state the unit, so the number is published unitless and the convention is noted, not assumed.
  • Enzymes were already the story in 2010. The RND block's DP of 0 and alpha of 9.5 are the same fact the 2019 Hartwick panel measured as below-quantification nine years later — the enzyme deficit this site's doctrine is built on was on the brewery's own worksheets from the start.
  • The sensory line is a period record — "somewhat floury, starchy, light, thin" is a rare written sensory observation on early production sorghum malt, preserved verbatim.
  • What we do not know: which lot or cultivar this malt was, who produced the RND results, and the basis for several unlabeled values. Those blanks stay blank; a recovered answer would be logged as a correction, never silently filled.

Download the dataset

Download as CSV — every cell as recorded, with per-row unit-labeling status and notes.

Record

First published 2026-08-24 as v1.0. Corrections to date: none. This dataset is a frozen record — it changes only for corrections, and every correction is logged in this section with its date and what changed.

Where else this data lives: nowhere else public that we know of.

How to cite this dataset

Malt analysis worksheet: Bard's malted sorghum, May 21, 2010. Bard's internal production record. Republished by Gluten Free Brewer, 2026. https://glutenfreebrewer.com/research/production-data/bards-2010-malt-analysis

Zenodo archiving for this dataset is pending; this page will state its DOI when the deposit completes, per the research library's archive practice.

Source and Validation Notes

Transcribed cell-for-cell from the original workbook recovered in the Bard's archive's legacy QA records (single populated sheet; two remaining sheets empty). Original spellings ("Protien," "FRIABILTY") are preserved and marked. The document is a Bard's internal record and is Bard's to publish; the source of the "RND RESULTS" block is not identified on the sheet and is therefore not attributed to any laboratory.