✳
GLUTEN FREE BREWERFROM GRAIN TO GLASS
NORTH AMERICAN CULTIVARS / DECISION TOOL

A BETTER SHORTLIST STARTS HERE

Choose
the grain.

Match a sorghum cultivar to the beer you want to make. See the trade-offs, question the missing evidence, and leave with a trial worth running.

Historical data built in · your notes stay in this tab until saved

01 / WHAT ARE YOU TRYING TO MAKE?

Change the priorities.
Watch the trade-offs.

Filters are your screening preferences. Lab colour is not finished-beer colour. A missing onset is unknown, not high. Filters do not remove candidates already on your shortlist.

02 / THE SCREENING LANDSCAPE

Extract has company.

3-DAY GERMINATION

Higher extract sits to the right. Clearer wort sits higher. Click a point to inspect the candidate; the ranked list contains the same values.

Points within each clarity band are spread vertically for readability. Clarity has only three reported categories; vertical offsets are not extra precision.

03 / BUILD YOUR SHORTLIST

Candidates, with the arithmetic showing.

ExtractProteinClarityFAN

The 12 additional cultivars in the full-dataset view are scored here with the same formula; their ratings are not listed on the decision page. Equal totals share a rank. Tied rows are shown alphabetically; row order does not break the tie. Scores are planning aids, not a probability of success or a qualification.

04 / THREE CANDIDATES, SIDE BY SIDE

What will you put in a trial?

Flavour can overturn the table.

Bard’s chose the red Blue Milo #4 on flavour. Its identity is confidential and it has no lab values in this table. Don’t invent a score for it—or assume any red will taste the same. Include a traceable flavour-led candidate in your trial plan if that is your priority.

05 / FROM SHORTLIST TO A REAL LOT

Leave with the right questions.

Select a shortlisted cultivar, identify the offered lot, then record the evidence you actually hold. Historical lab results never fill these fields for you.

A recorded “meets” status is your assessment with a document reference. This tool does not review certificates or approve a lot.

The evidence behind the tool

North American Sorghum Cultivars supplies the baseline rating and decision sequence. USDA Madison screening supplies the 25 cultivars and both germination lengths; comparisons and scores use only the 3-day records. Seed Standard 1, draft v0.3 supplies the evidence requests. The two DSC onsets are reported on the decision page from Veith’s 2009 K-State thesis, Table 3.6.

Source snapshot: seed-standards · 10e627f · 28 September 2026. Standard 1 is a proposed site standard, not a regulatory limit or independently ratified specification. Scores from a single historical screening are not predictions of current lots. Confirm seed supply, crop year, location and performance in your process. Ask about seed access ↗

HISTORICAL SCREENING / NOT A CURRENT LOT

YOUR LOT / YOUR EVIDENCE

Use one current lot per cultivar in this session. Start a separate saved session for a different lot.