Method 3: The SEBAmyl Two-Rest
This is one of four mash methods Bard's documented in 2018 while adapting its production process to homebrew scale, run on a Robobrew — a recirculating single-vessel electric system (why that equipment class matters). These are working notes from real sessions, not a validated homebrew protocol. Values are starting points; the scale-translation warnings apply to all four.
The run sheet
| # | Step | Target | Time | Additions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mash in | 163.4°F | — | Sorghum malt at 1.25 L/kg; 20 mL Termamyl SC DS in the foundation water |
| 2 | Liquefaction rest | 163.4°F | 100 min | — |
| 3 | Cool | 145°F | — | Cool water addition |
| 4 | Conversion rest | 145°F | 100 min | Termamyl + SEBAmyl L |
| 5 | Set pH | — | — | Drop to 5.4 |
| 6 | Run off | — | — | Vorlauf, sparge, lauter |
Target extract: 15.0°P (1.061).
What makes this one different
No boil, no transfer. Everything happens in one vessel at two temperatures. On a recirculating system that's close to push-button, and it's the method to start with if you're running this process for the first time.
A thick mash. 1.25 L/kg is roughly half the water of Method 1 — which concentrates the wort toward the 15°P target but makes stirring and heat distribution harder. Recirculation matters more here than anywhere.
163.4°F, not 190°F. This liquefies well below the production baseline, trading temperature for time — two 100-minute rests instead of a hot fast hold. Whether that costs anything in extract or beer quality is an open question.
Watch for
Mash thickness at 1.25 L/kg — if your pump struggles, thin it and record that you did; temperature stratification in a thick bed; and the total clock, which is over three and a half hours of rests before you even sparge.
Report back
Nobody has published results for this method at homebrew scale — which means your batch is data. Report efficiency, mash behavior, runoff, gravity against the 15.0°P target, fermentation, and what you'd change. See Research Ask #3 and tell us what happened.
Related
- Mash Methods at Homebrew Scale
- Why the 190°F Baseline Exists — the production position this method departs from